Opportunity defends rule allowing two board members to veto coalition deals

Opportunity leader Qiulae Wong has defended a constitutional provision that allows just two of the party's seven board members to veto a coalition agreement. The rule requires a 75 per cent majority for the board to approve any coalition or confidence and supply deals negotiated by the party's caucus. Wong stated that the board makes decisions in the best interests of the party membership and that such sign-off processes are not unusual.

ACT leader David Seymour has criticised the rule, calling it "undemocratic" and "extraordinary". Seymour noted that the provision allows a small number of people to effectively choose the country's government. He also raised concerns that one board member is a significant donor to the party.

Green co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said questions should be asked of the Opportunity Party regarding the rule. She noted that while her party also requires sign-off from delegates, the larger number of people involved prevents a concentration of power by an unelected group.

The Opportunity party plans to conduct a full review of its constitution next year. The party previously amended its rules in August to remove a provision that gave the board veto power over caucus decisions.

How it developed

• Fri 6 Nov, 5:00amACT leader David Seymour and Green co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick have publicly criticised the party's constitutional power structure.

Where reports differ

• While reports agree on the 75% threshold, one report notes the board consists of members elected by the party plus one appointed member and the leader.

Compiled from reports by RNZ, The Post, 1News, Otago Daily Times and Newsroom.